God draws our attention, again and again, to the very Story of Moses not only in the Old Testaments but also in the Holy Qur'an in order that we may follow the traces. It is notable that according to the religious history, God was reported to have appeared first time, in a visible or tangible form, not on the Mount Sinai but on the Mountains of Himalaya. Like the nations of 'Hood' the Nations of India were called 'Hidu' or 'Hida' rather then 'Hindu' or 'Hinda' which was expressed repeatedly in the Ashokan Inscriptions (in 3rd century B.C.) The word 'Hida' was used for 'India' and 'Hida Loka' for the Nation of India. The derivatives of Hida were used more than 70 times in the Ashokan Inscriptions. The very word 'Hida' is also used in Inscriptions of the Persian Monarch Darius wherein it stands for 'Hind' or 'India'. (Ref. The Inscriptions of Hamadan, Persepolis, Naqsh-e-Rustam: dated :circa 520-485 B.C.) Most importantly, the Holy Bible mentions the word 'Hadow' for the lands of India. The literal form of the Hebrew word 'Hadow' means 'flee away' or 'give you thanks' . It is used, as the name of the location, for the lands surrounding the Indus river which was mentioned as the Easter Borders of the Empire of Ahasuerus. (Biblical Ref. The Book of Esther 1: 1; 8: 9) These facts and figures are of extremely importance which casts the light on the neglected matter. Well, as we come to know that there is a single appointed one in every religion who is ordained to lead us directly to God, 'a Promised Guide'. On this account Jesus is reported to have declared which is recorded in the Gospel of St. Matthew 23: 8, 9, 10):

"But you! do not you be called Rabbi,
for one is your Rabb whereas all you are brothers.
Moreover, do not call anyone your father on earth,
for one is your Father, the Heavenly One.
Neither be called leaders,
for your Leader is one, the Christ."

Jesus attributed the leadership to the Christ instead of God, what do you think, whom 'Rabbaniyah' and 'Fatherhood' will, possibly, be connected with? Would that leader not be 'Haadi' or 'Mahdi'? At this point, I would invite the intellectuals, especially of Subcontinent, to a linguistic research which, I hope, will widen the horizons of our religious Scholars. In the final analysis, He can not be proved any other than Mahadev according to Hindus, 'My Face' according to Tawrah, Mattiya according to Budhha, the Christ according to the Gospel and 'Wajh-ullah' or 'Mahdi' according to Qur'an or the Prophet. It is not a matter of opinion, is it? Have you to say something against? The words are actually 'the acoustic expressions' which act as a vehicle for transmitting 'the Ideas' and are vocalized not only by Humans or other living Creatures but are also uttered by inanimate things. Sounds asinine? Let me clear it. The instinctive sounds like 'oh', 'ah', 'sh', 'aha', or 'hmm', which seem to be 'meaningless', do possess 'the ideas' and are, therefore, equivalent to Words. The best example, in my opinion, would be the Arabic Abbreviated or Broken Letters which have been used in Qur'an as 'the Verses' or 'the Message' (e.g. 'Alif-Laam-Meem', 'Ha-Meem' or 'Qaaf' equivalent to 'A-L-M', 'H-M' and 'Q' etc.) It is because each and every Letter, whether it be a Consonant or Vowel, is actually a Sound and does possess 'an idea' (for instance: In Arabic, single 'alif' or 'hamza' shows an interrogative state of verb, 'seen' stands for 'will', 'ba' for 'with', 'ta' for 'swear', 'fa' for 'then', 'kaaf' for 'like', 'laam' for emphasising, 'waw' for 'and' and 'ha' for 'he' or 'it') which are actually assigned by us but the real, the Universal Notions, almost remains beyond our comprehension. The sounds of animals, for instance, are nothing more than 'the funny meaningless noise' to us but are they really 'senseless'? They, the animals, do communicate with each other with the help of the same 'meaningless noise'. I hope, there would be no voice of dissent among the Muslims or Buddhists or Hindus, as to what I suggest, who do chant some 'Sound' or 'Syllable' like 'Om' or 'Hu' during their Meditations or Prayers nor even among the Christians whose gigantic Bells are reverberating the towering Structures of Cathedrals. Such meaningless sounds like Buzzing, Hissing, Chirping, Howling or Quacking, are meaningful for those who do use them as a medium. Similarly, the other sounds like burbling of water, clanging of metal, crunching of gravel or slamming of objects also possess 'meanings'. They do croon by means of their sounds. Be still and eavesdrop on what the river is babbling, the rain is pattering, the branches creaking and the leaves rustling in the breeze. Hearken! The blowing wind is hissing something in your ear. Who understands it? At this point, I hope, I have, now, elevated your mental focus to the state from whence you can behold the Grandeur of the Qur'anic Statments. Is the Holy Qur'an not communicating with anyone, when reveals some incomprehensible Sounds as 'a Message from God'? A Message for humans? Or likely to be for some other Creatures or Creation? The Qur'an broadens the horizons of man by opening the door on the Phonetic Research. Now it must be accessible to us how the Prophet Solomon had his Dominion over all the creatures, even was able to communicate with the animals even with things (17: 44):

"....There is not a thing but celebrates His Praise
and yet you understand not how they declare His Glory..."

Not only the weightiest, the mighty Mountains, and the lightest, the birds (34: 10; 38: 18, 19) but also the awesome rumblings of Thunder declares the Glory of God (13: 13). What a awesome utterance! Do you comprehend the sound which resonates the Cosmos? Just as the written word is derived from the simplest form of letters, 'the root word', likewise, the different verbal expressions have also their root in a single unit of Sound or the Mono-syllabic Expression which seems to be 'senseless' or 'meaningless' but in fact it is not and therefore the intonation influences even changes the meaning of a written word. The language, as every one knows, spread with time which took aeons to develop and is still ongoing. One language has its root in the other and thus they all have, ultimately, a single origin, like humans who despite being different from each other did have a single father, Adam. Despite slight inflections (with suffixes, affixes or prefixes) or deviations in meanings, all the words of a particular class contain the same 'sense' or 'theme' which is basically connected with their single origin, the root word. Just as the numberless words of Prophecies ended in a single Event (the Advent of the Messiah), likewise the uncountable divine Terms developed into a single and final term and reached their original or intended form like the process of Evolution. It is the key to understand the qur'anic statement that the Holy Qur'an is in the Pure Arabic Tongue which is, certainly, far from being a worldly language but the heavenly or Universal whose acoustic expressions are comprehensible not only to earthlings but also to the astro-creatures. The very divine Knowledge of Qur'an has its root in the Mother of the Book (Arabic: Umm-ul-Kitab) and therefore it stands to reason that the term 'the Mother of all the Phonetic/Acoustic Expressions' be applied to its Language. As for the possible etymological signs of development of the ancient term Mahadev into Mahdi, you will find its rough idea on the next pages. Saying honestly and in the raw, if you delve, impartially, into the depths of Religions in order to rough the eye-catching figure of God out in your mind, what will be doodled inadvertently will be the Personage of Maha-dev, the Lord Shiva. It is because God is Omnipresent. The eye can not capture what exists all around or permeates the surroundings, unless it appears in a reduced form or shape. We, for instance, will not be able to observe water if we be in the depths of it unless it be reduced to few drops. Likewise, our mind is not capable of understanding the infinite values. Therefore, God reduced His infinite Qualities to a limited level or form in order that the mind be able to discern whether God exists and distinguish between 'God' and 'Not-God'. The Mysticism that everything is God is invalid because it is not God what seems to be Not-God. Here I would mention an aphorism of the famous Philosopher, the Father of the Idealism the Bishop George Berkeley, even though I do not accept all his views (because he had presumed the Existence of God instead of proving it which is the first duty of a Philosopher.) That aphorism is 'To be is to be perceived'. Of course, how is it possible for 'A' to be 'B' even if it not be sensed as 'B'. You can, ignorantly, assume 'A' to be 'B', attributing all its qualities to it, as you do and also the mystics, so-called the spiritual guides. In Mysticism there is no need of a Guide, not even one can, possibly, become Guide. What you feel in the state of the emptiness of your mind, during a meditation, you may attribute it to a Universal Consciousness or Knowledge, an Eternal, a Timeless, a Formless Notion which is either of God or itself is God. What a nonsense! Is there any Mystic or Saint who has, physically or literally, turned out to be God? What did happen with the great Saint Jesus who introduced himself as the Son of God or with a Muslim Saint, named Mansoor Al-Hallaj, who used to utter that he himself was the Absolute? Is there even a single trace of them left on earth? Do not lay the foundations of Reality on Supposition. I am 'I' and you are also an 'I', even then I am not 'You' nor you are 'Me' nor can ever be. Logically, the existing things can not disappear within the Time & Space from the worlds of Existence. Even if the Substance be blasted or fragment, it will reduce itself to molecules or particles, scattering around into the atmosphere but its atoms will not cease to exist, like energy which can neither be created nor can be destroyed but it changes its one form into other. Whom do you remove from the Surface of Existence when assert 'I am God?' These are nothing but the idea of Idiots (who speak by means of the Satan) wherein our own selves will turn out to be God, and when? They are reported to answer, it is free of the bonds of time, hence, after millions of years or perhaps aeons 'I' will have known the Boundless Reality or I myself will have been, eventually, freed from the captivity of Body or the cycle of this materialistic systems and then transformed into or turned out to be God. Truly, who is blind in this World, will remain blind in the Hereafter. Now at this point I would point out the tangible Evidence of God's Existence in the Worlds of Matter. What man sees does, squarely, bear Witness to the Existence of its Creator and point at His Possible Self as 'The Third Person'. We, for instance, when behold the Nature, say, 'HE exists'. The sun, the stars, the flowers, the trees or the animals, do bear witness to their Creator, however, it is not of the Highest degree of Certainty which could only be gained by means of 'the Vision'. The blunder of man is that he searches for God who is reported to exist everywhere and also beyond our senses. In this case he should not search for Him but for such Witness which manifest His Creator as 'the Second Person' which meant 'You' rather than the third person 'He'. If we look at it, we have to say 'You exist' which is, without doubt, the Highest Degree of Certainty. It is, therefore, mentioned in the Holy Writs, that the very divine observable Form which reflects God's Existence is a Personage of Someone who is known as the Messiah or the Word or the Lord (Hebrew and Arabic= Rabb) in the religious terms. Therefore, the very point has been, strikingly, mentioned that the Glory became Flesh (Ref. The Gospel of St. John 1: 14). As to what the scientific terms could, possibly, be applied to it, I would try to clarify it in any other article. At best, it should be taken into account that all the Holy Scriptures represent God not as an Abstract but as a Concrete Reality as a Person. Even, not only His Spirit has been mentioned but also His body parts, Face, Mouth, Back, Hands even Fingers (Ref. The Book of Exodus 31: 18; The Book of Psalms 8: 3; 17: 15 etc.) It is true that these statements are symbolic and this Physical Personality does not allude to the Omnipresent Self of God, then to whom? Well, He will not be proved any other than the famous Promised one 'Paraclete' who is believed to be of the Essence of the Divinity who accomplished the Divine Task of Jesus Christ as he had informed, about whom the Prophet John kept proclaiming, although the very title 'Para-kletos' he did not use because the language of him or even of Jesus was not Greek into which the Universal divine Terms of the prophecies have been converted. (Ref. The Gospel of St. John 1: 1-14; cf. 14: 16) Interestingly, the very term 'Para-kletos' is never found anywhere else in any Gospel and no one is aware of 'him' except the Saint John upon whom the Vision of the Divine Ones were bestowed. Christians have understood, at least, this point aright that 'the Word' is not the same person about whom Jesus had foretold because he used the word 'another' in order to highlight the distinction between these expected Ones which clears that this promised person was not the one whom his listeners had already heard of and known before. (ibid. 14: 16) The key-word in the mentioned verse is 'another' which will lead us to the Enlightenment. All the key-words, concerning Him, remained intact and will always remain preserved till the Last Day so that you can trace Him whenever you turn to Him.

God styled Him 'God' since no other 'concept' or 'idea' was existing in the Beginning but one and only 'God'. All things began to be called by their names after they had come into existence. God, for instance, named the Light 'Day' when it appeared and the Darkness 'Night' which is mentioned in the beginning of the Book Genesis. No matter which medium, language or even the Sign God had used to express His Self, the acoustic expression which He mentioned to His creatures in the Revelations and divine Inspiration is indeed 'd'. All the words which are being used for God or the Divine Self in all different languages are the branches or derivatives of the ancient root of the Sanskrit word 'Dev'. In Urdu, for instance, it is 'Devta' (The Deity), also occurs in different forms like 'Data' (The Cherisher) or De'o (The Giant). In Latin the word for God is 'De'i' or Deus. By softening the 'd' sound into 'th' we attain the word 'Theos' which is of Greek for God. Their feminine are Dea and Thea respectively which means Goddess (Sanskrit: 'Devi'). The very word in French is 'Dieux' or 'Dieu'', in Spanish 'Dios' and in Italian 'Dio'. Let us see what the Vulgate Version of Bible uses for the One who goes on existing in Heavens. (Ref. The Gospel of St. John 1: 1)

The very word 'Deus' means God. All the words in all languages which are connected with the Divine Self or the Divinity always possess the letter or the consonant 'd' and have their roots in the ancient language of the Holy Ved, the Sanskrit. What about an English word, the article, 'the' which makes an unknown known, is it also from this source? The existence becomes manifest and shines out only if it belong to the Divine Self of God. The divine Eponym 'Dev' could, possibly, become Da, De, Di or even could be left as a single consonant 'd', in the case of contraction or in the case of adoption by any other language where it could remain as an unnoticed part or syllable of the Divine Word, acting like 'Schwa' or could occur, likely, with some deviation from the normal articulation because of different accents and dialects e.g. 'd', 'dh', 'th', 't', 'j' or even 'z'. The terms 'Tao-ism' (Daoism the religion of ancient China, means the Way.) and 'Shin-to-ism' (the religion of Japan which means 'the Way of Gods'.) or Zoroaster (the Founder of Zoroastrianism, the religion of Persia [the ancient Iran]) or 'Ahura Mazda' (the Almighty God in Zoroastrianism), or 'Hinduism' or 'Buddha' (the Founder of Buddhism) or the Hebrew term 'Yahood' or the Persion words 'Khuda' and 'Parwardigar' for God or the English words 'God' and 'Lord' or the most significant term for Religion, the Hebrew as well as Arabic word 'Dinah' or 'Deen' could be produced as the exemplars. All these words are pointing at the same Divine Self 'Dev' who is residing in Heavens and whose appellations 'Adhonai', 'Ha-Adhohn' and 'Ha-Moshiah' (The proper nouns of Hebrew which means 'Sovereign Lord', 'the Lord' and 'the Messiah' respectively.) appeared in the Inspired Writings of the Israelites.

Deus who is believed to be of the divine essence is the one around whom Christians' Creed of the Trinity centred, also called the Nicene Creed, which was proposed in 325 AD in the ecumenical Council of Nicea when this Proposition was posited and decreed in the presence of the Roman Emperor Constantine, the clergy and heathen philosophers, that Jesus, thenceforth, be considered 'the Son of God' and God one of the three. Who did misconstrue the divine Message? Why did such a blatant misunderstanding creep in even after having been known that no blood-relations (worldly relations) nor any word or sense thereof nor even any vague idea concerning things was existing before the Beginning, even in the Beginning, except the Consciousness of God that 'I am'? Which Name or Expression would God possibly have conferred on 'the Word' except this that 'You are Me'? This point may seem to be a Blasphemy under the Islamic Law which seems to insinuate that God accepted His Co-equal or Alike since the Word exists as a Second Person. This point always remained conflicting in Muslim Lobbies and they always repudiated it. In order to clear this problem, I would ask them, (1) Does the Word (whether it be the Prophet Muhammad or anyone else) speak anything from His own instinct or impulse?' and (2)'What was the first Inspiration or Message from God to Him?' Certainly, the Message must have provided the highest level of Certainty to Him which is mentioned under Qur'anic term as "Haqq-ul-Yaqeen" (The Final or Absolute Certainty or Knowledge). The Messiah recognises the Self of God neither as a third person,'He' (the absent that might be Imaginary), nor as a second person, 'You' (the Visible that might be deceptive), since they both lack the Highest degree of Certainty. The Messiah repeats or restates the wording of God 'I am God' because the first Message to Him was 'I am God' which were corporeally heard by the Prophet Moses when he heard God's Voice and beheld His Glory. (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 20: 14; 27: 9; 28: 30). As to why the Messiah has the authority to utter, 'I am God', the reason is that He speaks nothing but what He hears and He manifests nothing but what He perceives. It is God who is speaking through His Mouth not He himself. It was also betrayed by a muslim saint, named Mansoor Al-Hallaj, who asserted that it was not he himself who uttered 'I am the Absolute' but He. No Prophet or Messenger had this legitimate Position to utter the very Inspiration. Well, the Christendom should ascertain that their fundamental Creed is nothing but a Blasphemy. As for Messiah, is it befitting that he be styled 'the Son of God' instead of His Life-partner who lives ad infinitum? (cf. The Book of Isaiah 54: 5, 6) Do we not observe a manifest Sign thereof that the first woman Eve came from Adam's own Soul and she became his 'Spouse' rather than his 'daughter'? Saying coherently, a person needs a spouse to become a parent. If God, as everyone accepts, does not need 'a Spouse', why did, then, He need a 'Son'? Do those who accept Jesus as the Son of God accept this relation despite this divine as well as the worldly fact that a Child may never be reunited with Parents but Spouse for whom he does leave his Parents since they both are one. (cf. The Book of Genesis 2: 23, 24) Even two blood relatives (brother/sister, father/daughter, mother/son) may not produce a child and thus the incestuous relationships are strictly prohibited. Is the problem lying therein that Jesus had introduced himself as the Son of God? Therein lies the Key to the Enlightenment concerning the Secret instead. Be perspicacious and awaken yourself to the pregnant Allusion of him which refers whether to the One who is God or to Him who is styled 'God'? His words pointed at the true Messiah, the Mahadev, whose son he was. (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 90: 3) At this point I solve this Scientific Enigma as to how Mary had borne a child even a male despite lacking the Y-Chromosome which is found only in Males rather than Females. The very Y-Chromosome, fully endowed with the Spiritual Fruitfulness, was of the true Messiah which was sent down to Mary from the Heavens with the Holy Spirit who placed the divine male reproductive Cell in her Womb. Keep the point in your mind that the Holy Spirit is never assigned to bring the Glad Tidings but the Angels. Whenever the Holy Spirit is sent onto the earth, she brings 'something', any Blessing in some tangible form. It is also of importance to see how the Gospel betrays the very event. It says that Mary was found pregnant by the Holy Spirit. (cf. The Biblical Ref. The Gospel of St. Matthew 1: 18; Qur'anic Ref. 19: 17-22) Importantly, the case is not necessarily so that the inspired accounts insinuate the process of Intercourse since it was a Spiritual Union through a Spirit. The very kind of Spiritual Union which is only described in 'Mysticism' or 'Sophism' and is, usually, reported to experience by the mystics and spiritual guides. Also, what do the Holy Scriptures point out, which kind of relations we have with God? The husbandly relations (cf. The Book of Isaiah 54: 5; The Book of Jeremiah 31: 31, 32). This very unusual delivery is held to be miraculous not only in Christianity but also in Islam. It is beyond my understanding. Would you please answer this question to me; 'Is the usual or normal process of delivery not a Miracle wherein two particles transform themselves into a living Embryo or a living one?' Did God want to show in the case of Mary that He is really a god? If the case were so, Mary should not have gone through a normal process of delivery nor the birth-pangs. Without doubt, His Dignity is free of such subsidiaries. It is, therefore, now easy to understand whom the Holy Scriptures, namely the Gospel, represent as 'the Father'. The Key of Understanding lies in the hidden fact that the Universal Father, Mahadev, is the Word and the Messiah, hence He produced a Word and a Messiah and sent him into the world in order to reveal 'the Divine Promo' of His own coming Legend. It is Jesus whose name is mentioned as 'Ganesh' in Hindus' Holy Writings whose Mother Mary is well-known by the name of 'Durga Maa'. (Also Parvati and Kali, one of the faces of Mahadevi) Jesus' Insight as well as the Personage was so Perfect and Elephantine that no Prophet like him had ever been. It was he who could not have been shaken by any one but the Heavens and the earth could have moved at his behest and were given in his subjection. He was the one who made his Father known for whom the life is nothing but the dust of His Feet which can bring even an inanimate thing to life. (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 20: 96) It is He who sent His own Glory, His Hologram¹¹, (as a Messenger) upon the Mount Sinai as 'His Sign'. Thus, these spiritual Blessings and divine Characteristics were inherited in Jesus, as a result, from his Father, the Messiah and received a portion (feature) from His Spirit like Elisha and the Prophet John who had received or asked for a part from Elijah's Spirit. (cf. The Second Book of Kings 2: 9, 10; The Gospel of St. Luke 1: 15, 17; Qur'anic Ref. 4: 171) Not only the Lords of the Triad, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, are divine but also their next of kin, their own flesh and blood who had been prophesied along with them and were also to be ordained as the Chieftains of nations. By reason of this Blessed Position, the Family of the first Lord, the Lord Brahma, was predestined to bear the Lord Vishnu in his lineage and the Lord Vishnu and his family was elevated to the Highest Standard of Praise by having been chosen for the divine Ancestry of Mahadev. The third and the last Lord Mahadev is the Subject of all the divine Scriptures. It is the expected Messiah of all the nations and this delicate point is hidden in styling Jesus 'Messiah the Son of Mary' (Arabic: Maseeh Ibn-e-Maryam) by Qur'an in order to point out that there is the One who is not the Son of Mary (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 4: 171; 5: 17 etc.) The true Messiah is the Light that resides in Heavens, hence, in the Heavens He and His Bride, Durga, were joined in matrimony and always remained divine even whilst they resided upon the earth, in disguise of the Flesh, among the Mortals. On this account, God preserves the titles 'Father' and 'Mother' only for these Deities and Qur'an continues with the ancient custom of entitling these Lords and their Consorts 'Fathers' and 'Mothers' by styling the Consorts of the Prophet Muhammad 'Umm-ul-Mo'mineen' (which means the Mothers of the believers) and emphatically declares that they are not like ordinary women but outrank. It is notable that the Prophet Muhammad himself, did not receive the very title 'Ab-ul-Mo'mineen' (the Father of the believers) because the first and the last Lords of the Triad had received the very title 'Father', the Lord Brahma (the Prophet Abraham) worldly and Mahadev (Al-Mahdi) divine. (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 33: 6, 32, 33) This very aspect of Muhammad was fulfilled in the character of the Lord Vishnu whose incarnation in the person of Lord Krishan was an allusion to the life of the Prophet Muhammad. Because of his 'charming character' which is to say 'the desirable character' and many consorts (who had been represented as 'Gopis') he was represented as 'Krishan Kanhayya' a romantic person even besotted which is nothing but Embroidery in the inspired accounts. As for the Mahadev and His Consort, they are, ipso facto, the Universal Parents (cf. The subtle notion found in 3: 42 of the Holy Qur'an) What was existing beyond us and was going to appear on the Pages of History was being revealed to the Seers who committed it to the sacred Pages of the Holy Scriptures. This is the reason that they were mentioned specifically in the Divine Writings, before they had been born in the world, as 'the Deities' more exactly, 'the Ideals'. Those who are misled do not recognise Jesus' Father, they misconstrue the Message and do accept him as the Son of God, nor they understand that he was not the Great Lord which is to say 'the Mahadev'. Also, those who do recognise his Father enshroud His Identity in silence and reap the worldly benefit. The Jews, for instance, had known very well that Jesus was not even the Last Prophet much less the Messiah. That is why behind every inquiry of Pharisees were lurking two Lords, Vishnu and Mahadev which were actually the Prophet Muhammad and Mahdi. All the rhetorical questions were to be fulfilled either in the Glorious Character of Vishnu or in the Divine Personage of Mahadev. (Note: Go through all the enquiries of the Pharisees in the Bible and observe the divine Promises and Fulfilments in the religion of Islam. The Holy Qur'an also witnesses that this case was not only with the Pharisees and the Jewish Priests but also with the Pagans who always expected 'God-like' Messenger rather than 'Man-like'.) The Prophet John also sent his delegation to Jesus in order to enquire if he was the Last Prophet (The Lord Vishnu). He never expected Jesus to be the Messiah as the Christian Authorities misinterpret in order that his interrogation be veered onto the Messiah fending the last Prophet off. The Prophet John could never have raised the question concerning the Messiah for he himself was ordained as the divine Witness of Him. Actually, he enquired after the Prophet upon whom the Seal was to be imprinted. He was aware of this fact that he himself was not the last Prophet since the Prophet Jesus was younger than him, therefore, he put the very question to him. (The Gospel of St. Matthew 11: 2) Mahadev is the medium through whom we observe the Glory of God, the Omnipresent. Do our eyes find the mirror when we look at our image therein? It is how the real Self of God is reflected through Mahadev and therefore He is styled 'God' and the divine Light. The Holy Scriptures reveal the marvellous Signs. For instance, the Perfect Baptism:

"He will baptise you with Light and Fire."

What a astounding fact that every unclean thing makes all other things unclean if touches them except the Light and the Fire since it can not touch the light and if it touches the fire or even tries to get too close to it, it will burn and will, itself, become clean and pure. The fire does not change its face and form but does mould its face and form that comes near to it. That is why no one is capable of purifying the Souls except the Lord who baptises with Light and Fire (The Gospel of St. Matthew 3: 11) He is the one who pre-existed every creation and creature, thus, Agni, the Sign of God, pre-existed all the substances and became the first visible substance. Muslims must have heard this aphorism of the Prophet Muhammad who alluded to the expected one saying:

The Sword can not cut Him,
the Water can not drown Him and
the Fire can not burn Him'

Since He is the Light which is free of damages. It is fire which seems to support not only the life and its environment but also seems to subsist itself unceasingly. What does support the Universe? Even in this modern age it is fire that prepares food for us thrice a day and keeps us alive. Earthen Lamps are kindled in Mandir¹², with fire is blazed the Holy Walls of the Aatish-kada¹³, Menorahs are set in the Synagogues¹⁴, Candles are lighted in the Churches and to earthen Lamps is set light in the Shrines of Muslim Sufis¹⁵ but alack! you took no heed. It is amazing to see that the wild and ferocious beasts never fear anything but the fire. Does the one who petrifies everyone, the Devil (the Opponent of Dev) himself fear anything? Call the famous Qur'anic verse 'The Sign of the Seat' (Arabic: Ayat-al-Kursi) to mind and ponder what the Seat of Allah is. Is it anything other than the fire which not only supports the Life but also permeates the Whole Universe? (cf. 2: 255)

There always remains a pugnacious controversy among three great nations (Indians, Israelites and Arabs) over their fundamental beliefs and the war, even the gratuitous and grisly violence, is considered lawful on the basis of their respective tenet. Behind the veil of all these fundamental beliefs of all religions no one is hiding except the Personage of the Lord Shiva, in different shades and colours. Whether it be smoke or smell or heat all these are the signs of fire. Has the Knowledge, concerning Maha-dev, not come to the Muslims? What do they think who Mah-di is? Two Maha were predestined to appear into the world in the last days, the first, Mah(a)mad (Ref. The Song of Solomon 5: 10-16) and the latter Mahadev, the Great Lord (Ref. The Book of Malachi 3: 1) The Lord who be in the Centre or Middle is Maha-madh. (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 2: 143) The Sanskrit word 'Madh' or 'Madhya' means 'Middle or Centre or the thing which be in the Balanced Position' ; e.g. Madhya-Perdesh, Madham (slow) etc. The another homonym thereof is the word 'Mada' which signifies 'Pride'. Regretfully, some Hindus who carried out some research work on the Pre-Islamic Vedic History took it for 'Haughtiness' when they delved into the possible ancient origin and identified the Sanskrit word 'Maha-Mada' with the Arabic form 'Muhammad'. Like Jews who rendered the title 'Fruitful', of Ishmael, as 'wild ass' and also attributed the Pride of his mother Hagar to 'Haughtiness' even when they had known Ishmael to be a blessed one of God, the Hindus deprecated the fulfilment in the Person of Muhammad bin Abdullah. In the same way, some Hindus, despite having recognised the same Origin, also dare to stigmatise the Holy Persons in whom the Vedic Prophecies might, possibly, be fulfilled. Are they not expecting the tenth Incarnation¹⁶ of the Lord Vishnu? If the world were able to recognise the Lord Vishnu or His Reinarnation, why would the Lord Shiva have been reported to appear as the Destroyer in the end or why the last era would be attributed to 'Kaliyuga'? Well, in Hebrew the word 'Mahmad' signifies the Desirable, in another words, the One who be acceptable in every case to every one, for he is the Just and reconciles the nations of different thoughts and beliefs (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 3: 64) and puts the world into Right or Balanced Condition (cf. The Book of Isaiah 40: 3; The Book of the Prophet Daniel 8: 14; The Book of Revelation 6: 5 etc). On account of this the Prophetic Office of Muhammad bin Abdullah intervened between the Messianic Eras of Jesus and Mahadev (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 2: 143; 90: 3) The latter is the promised Messiah, the true Lord who is the Messenger of the Covenant, the Supreme One, whom every one is seeking (The Book of Malachi 3: 1) The Lord Vishnu and the Lord Mahadev are the ones upon whom the whole Law and Prophets hang (The Gospel of St. Matthew 22: 34-40) Their symbolical Images were being revealed to the ancient nations. Sometimes they appear in the form of the Images of two Cherubs on the Holy Walls of the Holiest Room of the Temple (in Jerusalem) or of the Tabernacle of Moses (The First Book of Kings 6: 16-28; The Book of Exodus 25: 18-22), sometimes they are symbolised by two Tablets upon which the Holy Engravings of ten Commandments of God are emblazoned (The Book of Exodus 34: 28, 29). Moses had shattered the very tablets into pieces to augur that these, both, would be rejected by Israel and the Covenant would be broken by them. Moreover, the ten digits (from 0 to 9) indicate perfection, thus, the Ten Commandments signify the consummation. The measurements of these two Cherubs, in the same way, always reach '10' from every side alluding to their perfection as well as to their eminently glorious period when they appeared and reigned in full Glory. The thread which had been used in the things of the Temple of Solomon, signifies the 'Relation' or 'Connection'. The blue thread denotes the Heavenly One (God / The Messiah) and the reddish purple thread 'the Flesh & Blood' (Man / The Prophet) and their combination reveals 'the Union' of both. Sometimes they appear as two Pillars in the forecourt of the Temple which reveal that the Holy Temple of Israel is supported by these both. (The First Book of Kings 7: 15-21; The Second Book of Chronicles 3: 15-17) It is amazing to know that the total height of the very Pillars denotes the whole period of their reign. Sometimes they seem to come down onto the earth as two Angels who clear the way of God and manifest His Glory (The Book of Malachi 3: 1) and sometimes appear as two Witnesses of God who accomplish the prophetic and messianic assignments in 1260 days (The Book of Revelation, Chapter 11) The metaphorical period of 1260 Days unveils their total lifespan upon the earth in the fleshy form. The number '10', once again, will help you to solve this riddle. The way the Holy Scriptures describe the things is wondrous. No mind can fully understand these signs. The term 'Witness', for instance, is interconnected with the Law, viz, the Commandments of God and alludes to the same divine Ones upon whom the whole Law hangs. In fact, no one, in the Law, can change even affect the Judgement but the Witness. How many witnesses are, at least, required to put the Law into effect or give countenance to the matter? Not two? (The Gospel of St. John 8: 17, 18; Qur'anic Ref. 13: 43) Did the modern Knowledge, of Mathematics, not unravel the Mystery? How do we find the Unknown value or object even its dimension or spatial details? These are the two Known who help us to find out the 'Unknown' (God). (Mathematical Notions "a+b=c or a²+b²=c²")

It is Mahadev who had concluded the Covenant as regards Himself as well as the Lord Vishnu with the Lord Brahma whose true identity has been lost in the mists of time and traces have been enshrouded in innumerable accretions of folklores and myths and thus sank into oblivion. He was the one who had passed the Inspired Knowledge of God, that is to say the Holy Ved, on to his followers. He is mentioned in the Divine Writs of Israel by the name of 'Abraham'. He was one of the great chosen ones but the greatest is He who is the Mediator between the Grand Creator and the Creatures. The agent of the Creation is Mahadev, for it is not befitting for the Absolute or Independent Self of Allah to indulge Himself directly in activities. Most importantly, nothing can be produced in substantiation of His Proof or even Praise but His own Self or the One who was created, directly, by the Hands of His own Self which is to say 'by His Will'. Despite showering the Blessings on the creatures He does not speak with us directly but asks the Prophet Muhammad instead to deliver His Words. On account of this most praiseworthy Status 'the Word' is termed 'God' since He is the only Representative of the Omnipresent Self of God and the Mirror of His Godly Qualities and is also held as the Universal Father since everything was generated through Him. The Heavenly Worlds belong to Him, whereas, the Materialistic World and its Law belongs to the Lord Vishnu which was revealed in the Visions of Hindu Seers. Those ancient divine signs and symbols used to be carved on stones as religious Monuments in order that they be a Sign for all even for the coming generations. Have a look at the following Emblem which shows that the Lord Vishnu governs the Materialistic System:

If the Lord Brahma is not the Prophet Abraham of old days, why is he mostly represented as an old man rather than young like the Lord Vishnu and the Lord Shiv? What is the reason behind that? Was he older than the Lord Shiva who had generated the Time? Of course not. The only reason of it is that he is held as 'the Father Figure' since he is the Patriarch of all the blessed Nations and Religions. Furthermore, what do his three faces signify, if not three Identities or Faces of the same Prophet which refer to three different introduction or historical backgrounds, Brahma¹⁷, Abraham¹⁸ and Ibrahim¹⁹? He used to have more faces, according to the religious Myths, but who did actually cause him to lose them? Is it also not the Lord Mahadev? It signifies that the Lord Mahadev did divest other Nations of the Divine Blessings through the Face of Abraham due to their sinful or undesirable activities.

Brahma was identified, mistakenly, with such merit because he was the first Lord who became father of all the blessed ones, it is he who also generated the other Lords of the Triad, the Lord Vishnu and the Lord Shiva, as their Father, in 'the Materialistic World' but not in the World of Existence. (Ref. Vishnu Purana; Biblical Ref. The Book of Genesis 26: 4; The Gospel of St. John 8: 39; Quranic Ref. 22: 78) In a strict sense, he did not create the Lords nor brought them into Existence but became a Door or Access for them to this world. It is the one and only Lord Mahadev, the third Person of the Triad, who carries out everything only at the behest of God, whereas, all others are inferior to Him and their power and blessings are generated through the only Divine Agency of Mahadev, otherwise we will recognise three Lords instead of the one which means, three Mediums of God's Glory! Two of them will always remain extra or rather de trop. Moreover, would the fundamental statement of every Scripture that 'God is one and no one is Co-equal or Alike' not signify, strictly, His single Source of Communication and also of Manifestation? Would 'many sources' not manifest 'many gods' even if the all be 'one'? We, for instance, possess the same Spirit but still are different. How could the distinction be, possibly, made between 'God' and 'the-Same-Like-God' (His Replica)? Awaken yourselves to the Enlightenment of the Phenomenon regarding the One-ness of God. As often than not, man is reported to have declared beholding the Qualities of the Creator by means of His Creation and claims, on that account, to recognise Him, but do you behold even a single Quality of Him which not be found anywhere the Creation? If, yes, then you have, actually, recognised God, you have, really, seen Him. In fact, His Glory even His personal Qualities and Aspects are manifested through the one & only Lord and it is Mahadev whose Face and Form are illuminated with the Eternal Warmth and Light (viz, Agni, the Guard of the Eternal Law) of the Omnipotent. He is the third Lord of the Triad which means the Immortal since the first or the second Lord can never govern unceasingly unless he be the Last One. The reign of Brahma (Abraham) spanned a limited period. He departed this life after being born among the mortals as the mortal and his Reign came to an end by being transferred to the next one as an inheritance, in order that they be fulfilled and therefore he, the Lord Brahma, is no longer worshipped in the Hindu Religion. The World belongs to Vishnu and the heavenly Kingship resides only in Mahadev through whom God is governing. Do not let it escape your mind that the Sign of Shiva is the Phallus²⁰, a metaphor which signifies the generative power and satisfaction which underlies every need and desire of all Beings. The Blessings of the Lord Shiva on the elder son of Abraham, named Ishmael, was a manifest Sign from Him, who had attained the generative power from the Divine Self of Mahadev, become 'fruitful' which was misinterpreted by the Jews who rendered the very word as 'the Wild Ass' (cf. The Book of Genesis 16: 12). It is Mahadev who favoured Ishmael with His own Divine Quality (cf. The Phallic Cult of Shiva) One of the beacons, the name 'Kedar', is also glimmering in the lap of Hinduism (Ref. One of the Twelve Jyotir-Lingas [the Stones], named 'Kedar/Kedarnath' [Note: 'Kedar-nath²¹' means 'The Lord Kedar'] set in the Temple of Shiva in the terrain of the Mount Himalayas; Biblical Ref. The First Book of Chronicles 1: 29-31; cf. The Book of Isaiah 42: 9-13; 60: 5-7) It is Mahadev who concluded the Covenant with Abraham and also initiated the Institution of Circumcision which is the Sign of keeping His Covenant by giving an impression of Emasculation or rather a notion of Castration, when one puts himself into seemingly less powerful state of masculinity in order to accept, literally, the Virility of the Lord Shiva. It also serves as a sign of the Blessed Nation of Mahadev which He had chosen for Himself as well as for the Lord Vishnu, to be born in. On this account the Holy Ved reveals the Knowledge about those who are the Most Praiseworthy and Desirable, which what Rig (Rik) itself means, 'to Praise' (cf. The divine term 'Mahmad' [means 'Desirable] or 'Muhammad' [means 'the Praised one'] mentioned in the Holy Bible and also in Qur'an.) The literal meanings of the Sanskrit word 'Rig Ved' is, therefore, 'the Visionary Knowledge of Praise' which is bestowed only upon the Seers (Sanskrit 'Rishi'; Hebrew: 'Tsopeh'; Arabic: 'Sophi or Baseer') by means of the Visions who are the real Philo-Sophers who observe the hidden things of earth even of heavens through the very five senses (Mind) except the Face of God which was kept preserved as the quid pro quo for those who were to receive Mahadev and were ordained by God, in the last days, as the Saints of the Most High or the Holies of the Supreme One. Rig-Ved instructs the world the rites of performing the Sacrifices and Rituals which was, actually, initiated by the Prophet Abraham (cf. Qur'anic Ref. 2: 128) and 'Sama-Ved' teaches Hymns and Melodies for the Chants in order that El (God) listen which is none other than the subtle notion of 'Ishma-el' (a Hebrew name ,which is a compound of Isma and El, means 'God has listened'). The word 'El' is Semitic which is used for God. In Sanskrit the Hebrew form of 'El', of course, would not be used and the word 'Isma' would be left alone. Likewise, the Hebrew form of the word 'Abraham' was likely to be '(A)Brahma' in Sanskrit. Abraham's former name 'Abram' whose origin is 'Abiram' is also significant which means 'My Father is exalted '. The Hebrew word 'Ram' means 'exalted' whose verbal from is 'Room' which corresponds to 'to lift or to exalt'. The Hebrew word 'Ram' is, seemingly, connected with the Sanskrit word 'Ram' or 'Rama' which means 'the one who operates all or the one who is dark-skinned, or delighting and charming'. (Its feminine is 'Ramna'). The equivalent of the Hebrew name 'Ishmael' in Sanskrit would, accordingly, be 'Rameshwar'. A Sanskrit compound of Ram and Ishwar . Certainly, Ram was identified with the Maha Ishwar whose Virile Self had blessed him. (cf. Maheshwara or Mahesvara one of the names of Mahadev). It was no one other than Ishmael who caused his Father to be elevated to such status of Leadership (Arabic: Imamah)of all the nations, hence just after his birth the name Abraham was bestowed upon him which meant 'The Father of a Multitude'. The linguistic traces, in Hinduism, are Brahma, Sama, Praise and Mahadev.

The Land of Mahadev, The Gardens of Eden

About the Gardens of Eden on earth it is reported to have mentioned in the Book of Genesis 2: 8-14:

"God planted a Garden in the East
and there He placed the man he had formed.
The Lord God made all kinds of trees grow from the soil, every tree
that was pleasing to look at and good for food.
Now the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge
of good and evil were in the middle of the Garden.
Now a river flows from Eden to water the Garden
and from there it divides into four head streams.
The name of the first is Pishon;
it runs through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold.
The gold of that land is pure; pearls and the onyx stone are also there.
The name of the second river is Gihon;
it runs through the entire land of Cush.
The name of the third river is Tigris;
it runs along the east side of Assyria.
The fourth river is the Euphrates."

So, according to the Book of Moses, the Eden was in the East but where in the East? Now we follow the traces which are the four rivers. The first river was Pishon which ran through the land of Havilah. The Hebrew word 'Havilah' means 'Circle' whose root word is 'Hool' which corresponds to 'whirl, twist or circle.' The very word, I think, is connected with the Arabic 'Haul' or 'Ma-haul' which means 'the surroundings'. The qur'anic verses, for instance 17: 1 and 27: 8, mention the very word 'Haul' or 'Hawl' which is identified with the surroundings of God's Presence. Most importantly, the 1^stcentury Jewish-Roman historian Flavius Josephus whose major work was 'Antiquities of the Jews' and 'Jewish War' had identified the very river Pishon with the river Ganges of India. The linguistic trace also leads us to the word 'Pashtoon', a variant of 'Pishon', which is connected with 'the ethnic Afghans' or 'the Pashto race' who are generally known as 'Pathans'. The name of their main city, 'Pesh-awar', is also connected with. The second river is mentioned under the name Gihon. According to the Bible this river flows through the land of Cush which is believed to be the land of the Ethiopians, the Africa which is certainly false. What the Modern Arabic Scholars have found out is the Land of Cush is what is known today as the Land of 'Hindu-kush' which is lying in the lap of the Blessed Himalayas. The Arabic form of the word 'Gihon' is 'Jayhun' which is derived from 'Gjhon', the word related to Afghan and Uzbek. The third river is mentioned as Tigris which flows through Assyria which is to say the modern Iraq and the West part of Iran, in another words, the Mesopotamia of old days which was identified with the title 'Cradle of Civilisation'. The fourth and the last river is a famous one the Euphrates which is believed to flow from 'the Land of Sunrise' or 'the East' (cf. The meanings of the ancient Greek word 'Anatolia' the name of the very land wherefrom it used to flow). It is noticeable that 'the Cradle of Civilisation' is not the mentioned land but India nor 'the Land of sunrise', 'the East'. This land was, perhaps, named after the source, the origin of the blessed tigris river, the Eden or India. .

The Manifestation of God's Glory always appears in the Person of the Lord Shiva, whose idols and figurines are the oldest and the land of Indus is believed to be His native land where this Maha-yogi appeared and enthroned Himself on the Mount Kailash, the topmost terrain of the Mount Himalayas. Do you not behold that both promised Lands, Israel and Arabia, are lying outside the Garden of Eden which was planted by God in the East of the World where He had settled Adam and Eve? (cf. The Book of Genesis 2: 8-14) Does it not click your mind why India became the Fount of all knowledge and civilisation which grew up in its cradle? Was it not the lofty lands of Himalayas where the Paradise used to be and where the Satan, the Devil, was not allowed to enter? On this account God had asked Adam, Eve and others, who were abiding therein, to 'get down' from the Paradise. The fact that the Paradise was on the mountainous region of Himalayas was misinterpreted by insincere religious resistant who made it ambiguous and highlighted it as 'a contradiction in terms'. Let us take a look at the features which Qur'an is reported to have unfolded as regards the Gardens of Eden. The point which Qur'an reveals again and again is: